Express Global

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Monday, 28 October 2013

New paper finds no evidence that climate has become more variable or extreme, says many models predict decreased variability

Posted on 10:21 by Unknown
A paper published today in Environmental Research Letters finds that there is "no firm evidence" that the global climate has or will become more variable or extreme. According to the authors, 

"debate rages in the literature about whether the climate has or will become more variable. There is currently no firm evidence that temperature variability has or will increase because questions have been raised about the methods used to reach this conclusion."  


"The IPCC has so far been unable to draw firm conclusions about whether temperature variability is increasing. Indeed SREX even contained the question 'is the climate becoming more extreme?'. To paraphrase the answer, 'we don't know'." 


"Once issues such as these [data analysis problems] have been accounted for, there appears to be little overall change in global temperature variability. In addition, Huntingford et al indicate that many climate models predict decreases in variability in the future, while [another model] essentially points to no change."



Debate heating up over changes in climate variability

Lisa Alexander and Sarah Perkins




2013 Environ. Res. Lett. 8 041001 doi:10.1088/1748-9326/8/4/041001 Published 28 October 2013

Abstract

Heatwaves have profound socio-economic impacts. Increases in temperature variability would exacerbate these impacts but debate rages in the literature about whether the climate has or will become more variable. There is currently no firm evidence that temperature variability has or will increase because questions have been raised about the methods used to reach this conclusion. However, irrespective of changing temperature variability, the impact from increases in the frequency and intensity of heatwaves will be a major problem for the future.[non-sequitur]

Heatwaves kill people and cause enormous economic and environmental damage [1, 2]. In 2012, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Special Report on Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation (SREX) concluded that there was medium confidence that the length and/or number of heatwaves had increased since the middle of the 20th century and that it was very likely that the length, frequency, and/or intensity of these events would increase over most land areas by the end of the 21st century [3]. These conclusions were reiterated and strengthened by the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report (AR5) [4], released last month. However the IPCC has so far been unable to draw firm conclusions about whether temperature variability is increasing. Indeed SREX even contained the question 'is the climate becoming more extreme?'. To paraphrase the answer, 'we don't know'. If it is, then the impacts from changes in extreme heat could be far greater than if only mean temperatures were increasing.

In recent years several studies have tried to address this question directly. Some have analysed daily observational data [5, 6] but these data are not available across the whole globe. Methodological differences between these studies mean that the results are hard to compare. Most studies, including Coumou and Robinson [7], who investigated both past and future temperature variability, have used monthly or seasonal temperature data as a proxy for severe heatwaves [8–10]. This allows a more global assessment. However, although a relationship exists between extreme monthly mean temperatures and the presence of heatwaves [8, 9], monthly temperatures do not reflect the intensity and duration of heatwaves—the aspects that are likely to have the most severe impact on people and the environment. In contrast to the studies based on daily observations, the studies using monthly or seasonal data [8–11] can be compared but disagree on temperature variability.

There are two camps: one that says that temperature variability is increasing globally [9] and one that says that it isn't [10, 11] (or at least that the jury is still out [6]). The validity of the method used by the first camp [9] and also incorporated into the Coumou and Robinson study, has been questioned by studies in the second camp [10–12]. The main issue relates to the normalization of temperature anomalies, creating the impression that overall variability has increased [10]. Other problems relate to the existence of trends in time series and the changing number of observing stations over time [11]. Once issues such as these have been accounted for, there appears to be little overall change in global temperature variability. In addition, Huntingford et al [10] indicate that many climate models predict decreases in variability in the future, while [7] essentially points to no change. However there does seem to be some consistency between the studies in both camps that variability has increased in some regions e.g. western Europe.


Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to Facebook
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • The green dream is not compatible with billions of the poor in search of higher living standards
    A Common Fallacy in the Energy and Climate Debate By [warmist] Schalk Cloete, The Energy Collective, 9/10/13 The vast majority of the energy...
  • Gavin's worry about the state of understanding of climate science comes true
    From a comment at WUWT: DB   says: December 28, 2013 at 5:34 pm Jimbo wrote: “Wasn’t Gavin for a specified period of no global surface warmi...
  • Cold fact: More record lows than highs in the USA in 2013
    Cold fact: More record lows than highs in the USA in 2013 By Doyle Rice, @USATODAYWeather, USA TODAY Posted 1/2/2014 12:00:03 AM Miley Cyrus...
  • Special Report: The Age of Plenty debunks alarmist claims of food shortages
    Paging Paul Ehrlich :  IEEE Spectrum , the journal of the world's largest professional association for the advancement of technology, ha...
  • Paper: Scientists on ice are media's nightmare
    EDITORIAL: Scientists on ice are media's nightmare The Gazette editorial •  Updated: January 4, 2014 at 8:28 am  • Published: January 4,...
  • UK Climate Commission submission: IPCC AR5 Report 'definitely weakens the case for action' on climate
    A submission to the UK Energy and Climate Change Committee inquiry into the IPCC AR5 Report points out how the IPCC has deliberately obscure...
  • Fossil Fuels to the Rescue in Antarctica
    Fossil-Fueled Ingenuity to the Rescue in Antarctica Thanks to modern technology, those stranded researchers didn't meet a fate that has ...
  • Executive Summary of the NIPCC Climate Change Reconsidered II Report
    Executive Summary from the NIPCC Climate Change Reconsidered II Report, released 9/16/13: Executive Summary  This report is produced by the ...
  • New paper finds glaciers have been melting naturally at the same rate since 1850, no acceleration predicted
    A paper published today in The Cryosphere finds global glaciers melted at the same rate in the first half of the 20th century as in the sec...
  • Ship of fools finally rescued by irony
    Carbon to the Rescue Fossil fuels power retrieval of trapped climate scientists. WSJ.COM 1/2/13: Reporting on the environmental movement has...

Blog Archive

  • ►  2014 (20)
    • ►  January (20)
  • ▼  2013 (480)
    • ►  December (77)
    • ►  November (64)
    • ▼  October (65)
      • New paper finds Pacific Ocean has been significant...
      • New paper finds natural variability responsible fo...
      • New paper finds the subarctic was much warmer than...
      • New review paper finds temperature history of Anta...
      • New article in Nature says IPCC refused examinatio...
      • Article in Nature says global warming will increas...
      • Satellite sea level data has been "adjusted" upwar...
      • Growing Risk Of A Maunder Minimum 'Little Ice Age'?
      • WSJ: U.S. carbon emissions fell in 2012, thanks to...
      • New review paper finds Medieval and Roman Warm Per...
      • New paper demonstrates climate models don't even h...
      • Obama's 'social cost of carbon' is at odds with sc...
      • New paper says biofuels will cause high food price...
      • New paper finds no evidence that climate has becom...
      • New paper finds the Sun controlled precipitation i...
      • Huffington Post shows how anthropogenic global war...
      • UN climate chief says to disregard the IPCC's carb...
      • New paper finds another huge error in carbon cycle...
      • A scientific 'no change in temperature' model outp...
      • New paper explains how climate change mitigation h...
      • Al Gore, the 'patron saint of climate fraud', thro...
      • New paper finds great optimism about sustainabilit...
      • New paper shows "social benefit of carbon" far exc...
      • New paper finds largest ice cap in Tibet shows alm...
      • New paper finds the natural Pacific Decadal Oscill...
      • New study finds most people won't spend even $55 t...
      • New paper finds 4 Alaskan glaciers are about the s...
      • New paper finds solar UV varies up to 100% during ...
      • New paper finds summer temperatures in the year 20...
      • New paper finds European fire activity is at lowes...
      • New paper shows ocean 'acidification' was about th...
      • New paper finds climate models exaggerated warming...
      • New paper finds thermal comfort & tourism climate ...
      • New paper says it is impossible to define the term...
      • New paper finds natural ocean oscillations control...
      • New paper finds natural ocean oscillations explain...
      • New review paper finds greening from CO2 throughou...
      • How Gore & billionaires profiteer on taxpayer subs...
      • New paper debunks claims that fossil fuel use coul...
      • New study finds the natural Pacific Decadal Oscill...
      • Europe's wind & solar dream becomes a nightmare
      • Climate Alarmists Seek Shelter From Public Storm
      • CNN features a Paul Ehrlich impersonator who says ...
      • New Book: An environmentalist's journey to climate...
      • Supreme Court to decide if EPA can make laws witho...
      • Paper finds another amplification mechanism by whi...
      • New paper finds another amplification mechanism by...
      • New paper finds warming improves plant health and ...
      • Peak Oil Redux: World oil production is 50% higher...
      • New paper shows climate models falsely predicted A...
      • Review paper finds the Medieval Warm Period was wo...
      • New paper finds natural North Atlantic Oscillation...
      • WSJ Op-Ed: We have to kill eagles with wind turbin...
      • New paper finds SW Pacific Ocean surface temperatu...
      • New paper finds no evidence of AGW in West Antarctica
      • Father of chaos theory explains why it is impossib...
      • Study finds global ocean warming has decelerated 5...
      • New paper claims over 100% of all man-made CO2 has...
      • New paper finds models unable to reproduce natural...
      • Settled science: New paper finds atmospheric mecha...
      • New paper finds multiple amplification mechanisms ...
      • IPCC more confident about greater uncertainty
      • New paper finds another amplification mechanism by...
      • Helping the IPCC with decadal trend graphs
      • New paper finds E. Antarctic ice shelf gaining mor...
    • ►  September (130)
    • ►  August (108)
    • ►  July (36)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile